Start noting what's up and what goals have been met #799
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. What we could do later would be to create discussions for each of the topics in "FUTURE.rst", and then link them in the file.
Regarding the issue of pattern matching, @rljackobson talked about certain possibilities here:Mathics3/mathics-omnibus#14
If he is up for it, I guess it could be possible to start by trying to decouple a little bit more the pattern matching code from the rest of the mathics-core, and then see if it is possible to replace some part with the existing python libraries without breaking the tests in the CI.
Good idea - I'll start doing that and adjust this to point to that. |
|
@mmatera Ok - I have made basically the most minimum stab at this. Feel free to add add or start discussions. just commit on top of this with the links. Sometime before release, I merge whatever has been accumulated. I mostly wanted to give people a heads up and get something start here, on this aspect I should have been documenting better. |
Mention in PAST that we have been moving towards more modern Python practices
and solicit help
I should have started this earlier and we should have started a longer discussion of this.
But hey this is a start. I want to have something in place for the 6.0.0 release.
Your comments and ideas are welcome.
I seem to recall something around
\!that involved precedence that was deferred that might go on the list.